I really should just give up on reviewing movies, and just hire Jonny to do movie reviews. He's the brain and the talent, I just have a lame blog. Oh well here it is.
If you’re like me and sometimes complain about how hard or stressful your job is, it’s always nice when something comes along to refocus your perspective. After seeing director and co-writer Oren Moverman’s beautifully acted new film The Messenger, I not only developed a newfound appreciation for my job, I became better acquainted with some of the most grueling work a human being can be called upon to perform.
The story centers around decorated U.S. Army soldier, Staff Sgt. Montgomery (Ben Foster) and his return to America from Iraq. He is in rough shape, and adding some challenging adversity to post-traumatic stress disorder, he is assigned to the Casualty Notification program. His mentor and fellow officer, Capt. Stone (Woody Harrelson) is a tricky combination of by-the-book stickler and loose cannon (though the script sometimes seems unsure of this mixture). Montgomery and Stone are the ones delivering news of a fallen soldier’s death to parents, wives, children. There are various rules for the officers charged with this grim duty, among them, “Do not touch the NOK,” as Stone says, meaning the next of kin.
The Messenger is not itself grueling, which is practically a miracle. Rather, this pungent little chamber piece offers a full yet delicate range of emotions, and it humanizes its characters so that polemics are left in the background. It takes place in the present, but the conflict claiming military lives could be any conflict, not just America’s involvements in Iraq and Afghanistan. The movie has little to do, in any respect, with a nerve-racker like The Hurt Locker except this: Both are apolitical without being soft-headed -- and both honor the warrior without lionizing the war. Actually, they share another similarity: they are both among the best movies of the year.
Ben Foster (the best actor you’ve never heard of) plays Montgomery, and he embodies everything the role needs: a plausibly tough war hero, a man struggling to find his place back on American soil, a volatile, combustible soul, a dimensional dramatic creation. Foster can be pretty showy as a performer (his turn in the 3:10 to Yumaremake was both impressive and road-hoggy), but he’s lower-key and spot-on here. With Harrelson’s performance as Stone, we can now safely say that he has always been a valuable and versatile presence, even in junk, right from the beginning of his screen career. He seems visibly relieved to be working on a strong, honest script. Like Foster, he can be accused of outsize effects, but in The Messenger he’s solid as a rock and very moving. Samantha Morton is warm and true as Olivia, the widow who wonders if this unsteady young man, Stone, is out to “take advantage of (her) grief.” The relationship has a connect-the-dots air, but the details, the interactions, go a long way toward fleshing things out.
Moverman and cinematographer Bobby Bukowski shoot the movie like a ’70s artifact, with slow zooms and an unforced feeling of ambience. The results make up for any number of other, lesser, clunkier movies relating to the war in Iraq. Then again, The Messenger is worth seeking out for the simple reason that it’s not Iraq-specific. Rather, it’s quietly universal. It’s a moving and powerful film that should garner plenty of critical acclaim. I give this movie an...
XTRA-LARGE BAG OF POPCORN
I really want to see this. Especially now after the review. If you say it's one of the better movies of the year, then that definitely peeks my interest. One question though... is it better than Transformers? Because that is true art!
ReplyDeleteJose
Great call on Ben Foster. He doesn't get enough credit for how good he is.
ReplyDeletei love this movie! i saw it yesterday night. your right, really good performances!!!
ReplyDeletewell well... it looks like i might have to check in on this blog from time to time. nice review jonny.
ReplyDelete